Delgado v. Department of Homeland Security and Immigration and Customs Enforcement
This text of Delgado v. Department of Homeland Security and Immigration and Customs Enforcement (Delgado v. Department of Homeland Security and Immigration and Customs Enforcement) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
SEVERIANO GONZALES DELGADO CIVIL ACTION
VERSUS NO. 22-3104
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECTION I SECURITY AND IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT
ORDER & REASONS
Before the Court is a petition1 by Severiano Gonzales Delgado (“Delgado”) seeking relief from a federal conviction in the Northern District of Alabama.2 The petition states that Delgado is currently “serving a state sentence, with a future federal sentence to serve.”3 The petition indicates that Delgado is currently incarcerated in a state facility in Alabama.4 It is not clear whether Delgado is seeking relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241, 28 U.S.C. § 2255, or both.5 This Court lacks jurisdiction to provide relief pursuant to either statute, and will therefore dismiss Delgado’s petition. Section 2241 authorizes district courts to grant habeas corpus relief “within
1 R. Doc. No. 6. 2 Id. at 2 (listing a case in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama as “the decision or action [Delgado is] challenging”) 3 Id. at 1. 4 Id. (listing “Limestone Corrections, Alabama Department of Corrections” under “place of confinement”) 5 The form petition is labeled “Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus Under 28 U.S.C. § 2241,” and Delgado has also filled out the section labeled “Motion Under 28 U.S.C. § 2255.” He further states that he wants the Court to “vacate [his] firearm convictions and order [him] deported from the United States.” Id. at 8. their respective jurisdictions.” 28 U.S.C. 2241(a). “[T]he district of incarceration is the only district that has jurisdiction to entertain a defendant’s § 2241 petition.” Lee v. Weitzel, 244 F.3d 370, 373 (5th Cir. 2001). Because Delgado is not incarcerated within the Eastern District of Louisiana, this Court lacks jurisdiction over his § 2241 petition. Section 2255 allows an incarcerated person to challenge the validity of their sentence by “mov[ing] the court which imposed the sentence to vacate, set aside, or correct the sentence.” 28 U.S.C. § 2255(a). “A section 2255 motion must be filed in the sentencing court.” Pack v. Yusuff, 218 F.3d 448, 452 (5th Cir. 2000); accord Ojo v. Immigr. & Naturalization Serv., 106 F.3d 680, 683 (5th Cir. 1997) ([T]he only court with jurisdiction to hear [petitioner’s § 2255 claims] is the court that sentenced him[.]”). This Court did not impose either of Delgado’s sentences. This Court therefore lacks jurisdiction over his § 2255 petition. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the petition is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. New Orleans, Louisiana, October 11, 2022.
An__
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Delgado v. Department of Homeland Security and Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/delgado-v-department-of-homeland-security-and-immigration-and-customs-laed-2022.