DeLaurie Associates v. Martinez

11 A.D.3d 213, 782 N.Y.S.2d 428, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11503
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 5, 2004·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Determination of respondent dated December 23, 2002, which affirmed the findings of an Administrative Law Judge, made after a hearing, that petitioner had violated the length and weight provisions of the New York City Traffic Rules and Regulations, and imposed a penalty, unanimously confirmed, the petition denied and the proceeding (transferred to this Court by order of Supreme Court, Bronx County [Alexander W. Hunter, Jr., J.], entered on or about August 13, 2003) dismissed, without costs.

The determination that petitioner’s vehicle was oversized and overweight in violation of 34 RCNY 4-15 (b) (3) and (9) is supported by substantial evidence. Petitioner waived its jurisdictional objections when it appeared and challenged the charges against it at the administrative hearing (Matter of Clinton Ave. Constr. Corp. v Martinez, 8 AD3d 273 [2004]). In any event, service of the summonses upon petitioner’s driver was sufficient to obtain personal jurisdiction over petitioner (Vehicle and Traffic Law § 385 [20-a]; see Matter of IESI NY Corp. v Martinez, 8 AD3d 667 [2004]). Concur—Tom, J.P., Williams, Friedman, Marlow and Sweeny, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DeLaurie Associates v. Martinez, 11 A.D.3d 213, 782 N.Y.S.2d 428, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11503 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).

11 A.D.3d 213 (DeLaurie Associates v. Martinez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Isabella City Carting Corp. v. Martinez
15 A.D.3d 281 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
Tri Messine Construction Co. v. Martinez
15 A.D.3d 283 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)