Delahanty v. Anderson

161 A.D.2d 1164, 556 N.Y.S.2d 423, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9166
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 11, 1990·No. Appeal No. 2·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly denied defendants’ motion to correct a judgment entered in accordance with an arbitration award on the grounds that it erroneously included an award of [1165] prejudgment interest. Defendants also sought restitution for the interest portion of the judgment which they had allegedly satisfied by mistake. A judgment which is paid and satisfied of record ceases to have any existence since a defendant, by paying the amount due, extinguishes the judgment and the obligation thereunder (H.D.I. Diamonds v Frederick Modell, Inc., 86 AD2d 561, appeal dismissed 56 NY2d 645). (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Cayuga County, Contiguglia, J. —modify arbitration award.) Present—Dillon, P. J., Callahan, Denman, Balio and Lowery, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Delahanty v. Anderson, 161 A.D.2d 1164, 556 N.Y.S.2d 423, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9166 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1990).

161 A.D.2d 1164 (Delahanty v. Anderson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cach, LLC v. Ryan
2018 NY Slip Op 755 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018)
Samuel v. Samuel
69 A.D.3d 835 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)
Valtech Research, Inc. v. Meridian Abstract Corp.
23 Misc. 3d 531 (Civil Court of the City of New York, 2009)
Delahanty v. Anderson
161 A.D.2d 1165 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)