Del Hoyo v. New York

378 U.S. 570, 84 S. Ct. 1928, 12 L. Ed. 2d 1039, 1964 U.S. LEXIS 857
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided June 22, 1964·No. 893, Misc·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

378 U.S. 570 (1964)

DEL HOYO
v.
NEW YORK.

No. 893, Misc.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided June 22, 1964.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE APPELLATE DIVISION, SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, FIRST JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT.

Leon B. Polsky and Edward A. Miller for petitioner.

Isidore Dollinger and Irving Anolik for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Judicial Department, is vacated and the case is remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent with the opinion of this Court in Jackson v. Denno, ante, p. 368.

MR. JUSTICE BLACK, MR. JUSTICE CLARK, MR. JUSTICE HARLAN and MR. JUSTICE STEWART dissent for the reasons stated in their dissenting opinions in Jackson v. Denno, supra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Del Hoyo v. New York, 378 U.S. 570, 84 S. Ct. 1928, 12 L. Ed. 2d 1039, 1964 U.S. LEXIS 857 (1964).

378 U.S. 570 (Del Hoyo v. New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Ussery
452 S.W.2d 146 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1970)
Commonwealth Ex Rel. Butler v. Rundle
206 A.2d 283 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1965)