Defenders of Wildlife v. Hogarth

Federal Circuit

Defenders of Wildlife v. Hogarth

344 F.3d 1333, 2003 WL 22225790

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit·Decided September 25, 2003·No. No. 02-1224·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinions

ORDER

A petition for rehearing en banc was filed by the Appellants, and a response thereto was invited by the court and filed by the Appellees. This matter was referred first as a petition for rehearing to the merits panel that heard the appeal. Thereafter, the petition for rehearing en banc, and response were referred to the circuit judges who are authorized to request a poll whether to rehear the appeal [1334]*1334en bane. A poll was requested, taken, and failed.

Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The petition for rehearing is denied.

(2) The petition for rehearing en banc is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

A petition for rehearing en banc was filed by the Appellants, and a response thereto was invited by the court and filed by the Appellees. This matter was referred first as a petition for rehearing to the merits panel that heard the appeal. Thereafter, the petition for rehearing en banc, and response were referred to the circuit judges who are authorized to request a poll whether to rehear the appeal [1334]*1334en bane. A poll was requested, taken, and failed.

Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The petition for rehearing is denied.

(2) The petition for rehearing en banc is denied.

Defenders of Wildlife v. Hogarth, 344 F.3d 1333, 2003 WL 22225790 (Fed. Cir. 2003).

Pincite

344 F.3d 1333 (Defenders of Wildlife v. Hogarth) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinions

Related