Decker v. Nash
105 N.J.L. 488
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancelloe, Chiee Justice, Teenchaed, Paekee, Kalisch, Katzenbach, Lloyd, Van Buskiek, McGlennon, Kays, Heteield, Deae, JJ. 12.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Decker v. Nash, 105 N.J.L. 488 (N.J. 1929).
105 N.J.L. 488 (Decker v. Nash) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.