Decatur County v. Praytor, Howton & Wood Contracting Co.

142 S.E. 919, 38 Ga. App. 74, 1928 Ga. App. LEXIS 39
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Decatur County v. Praytor, Howton & Wood Contracting Co.. Read the opinion of the Court — 36 Ga. App. 611
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided April 10, 1928·No. 17194·Published

Opinion

Luke, J.

Under the ruling of the Supreme Court in this case, made on February 14, 1928, 165 Ga. 742 (142 S. E. 63) (the case having been brought before that court from this court by writ of certiorari), the petition as amended failed to set out a cause of action, and the trial court erred in overruling the general demurrer. In conformity to that ruling, the former judgment of this court, holding that the trial court properly overruled the general demurrer to the petition as amended (36 Ga. App. 611, 137 S. E. 918), is vacated, and the judgment of the lower court is

Reversed.

Broyles, O. J., and Bloodworlh, J., eonew.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Decatur County v. Praytor, Howton & Wood Contracting Co., 142 S.E. 919, 38 Ga. App. 74, 1928 Ga. App. LEXIS 39 (Ga. Ct. App. 1928).

142 S.E. 919 (Decatur County v. Praytor, Howton & Wood Contracting Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Decatur County v. Praytor, Howton & Wood Contracting Co.
142 S.E. 73 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1928)
Shinn v. Shinn
142 S.E. 63 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1928)
Decatur County v. Praytor, Howton & Wood Contracting Co.
137 S.E. 918 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1927)