Decatur County v. Praytor, Howton & Wood Contracting Co.

142 S.E. 919, 38 Ga. App. 74, 1928 Ga. App. LEXIS 39
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedApril 10, 1928
Docket17194
StatusPublished

This text of 142 S.E. 919 (Decatur County v. Praytor, Howton & Wood Contracting Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Decatur County v. Praytor, Howton & Wood Contracting Co., 142 S.E. 919, 38 Ga. App. 74, 1928 Ga. App. LEXIS 39 (Ga. Ct. App. 1928).

Opinion

Luke, J.

Under the ruling of the Supreme Court in this case, made on February 14, 1928, 165 Ga. 742 (142 S. E. 63) (the case having been brought before that court from this court by writ of certiorari), the petition as amended failed to set out a cause of action, and the trial court erred in overruling the general demurrer. In conformity to that ruling, the former judgment of this court, holding that the trial court properly overruled the general demurrer to the petition as amended (36 Ga. App. 611, 137 S. E. 918), is vacated, and the judgment of the lower court is

Reversed.

Broyles, O. J., and Bloodworlh, J., eonew.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Decatur County v. Praytor, Howton & Wood Contracting Co.
142 S.E. 73 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1928)
Shinn v. Shinn
142 S.E. 63 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1928)
Decatur County v. Praytor, Howton & Wood Contracting Co.
137 S.E. 918 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1927)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
142 S.E. 919, 38 Ga. App. 74, 1928 Ga. App. LEXIS 39, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/decatur-county-v-praytor-howton-wood-contracting-co-gactapp-1928.