Decalo v. Wearing Apparel Trucking Co. Inc.

58 A.D.2d 640, 396 N.Y.S.2d 46, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12716
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 27, 1977·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

— In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, entered June 16, 1976, which denied her motion: (1) to remove the action to that court from the Civil Court of the City of New York; (2) to increase the ad damnum clause of the complaint; and (3) for leave to serve a supplemental complaint nunc pro tunc. Order reversed, without costs or disbursements, and motion granted. Plaintiff’s papers show that she may have a meritorious cause of action and that the delay did not prejudice the defendant (cf. Darrow v Delñno Crescenzo & Sons, 55 AD2d 635). Hopkins, J. P., Hargett, Shapiro and Suozzi, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Decalo v. Wearing Apparel Trucking Co. Inc., 58 A.D.2d 640, 396 N.Y.S.2d 46, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12716 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1977).

58 A.D.2d 640 (Decalo v. Wearing Apparel Trucking Co. Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Poole v. Hertz Corp.
65 A.D.2d 787 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1978)