Darrow v. Crescenzo

55 A.D.2d 635, 390 N.Y.S.2d 168, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15378
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 20, 1976·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated June 4, 1976, which denied his motion (1) to remove the action to that court from the Civil Court of the City of New York, and (2) to increase the ad damnum clause of the complaint. Order reversed, in the interest of justice, without costs or disbursements, and motion granted, on condition that plaintiff’s attorney personally pay the sum of $250 to defendant within 20 days after service upon plaintiff of a copy of the order to be made hereon, together with notice of entry, otherwise, order affirmed, without costs or disbursements. Plaintiff’s papers show that he has a meritorious cause of action and that the delay did not prejudice the defendant. However, in granting plaintiff’s motion in the interest of justice, this court does not condone his attorney’s inadvertence and neglect and, for that reason, has imposed a penalty upon him personally (see Moran v Rynar, 39 AD2d 718). Gulotta, P. J., Hopkins, Martuscello and Suozzi, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Darrow v. Crescenzo, 55 A.D.2d 635, 390 N.Y.S.2d 168, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15378 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

55 A.D.2d 635 (Darrow v. Crescenzo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Poole v. Hertz Corp.
65 A.D.2d 787 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1978)
Decalo v. Wearing Apparel Trucking Co. Inc.
58 A.D.2d 640 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1977)