DeCaire v. Mukasey

“our law is that temporal proximity alone can suffice to ‘meet the relatively light burden of establishing a prima facie case of retaliation.’” (quoting Mariani-Colon v. Dep’t of Homeland Sec. ex rel. Chertoff, 511 F.3d 216, 224 (1st Cir. 2007))

Amirault v. City of Malden

District of Columbia, 2018

"our law is that temporal proximity alone can suffice to 'meet the relatively light burden of establishing a prima facie case of retaliation.' " (quoting Mariani-Colon v. Dep't of Homeland Sec. ex rel. Chertoff , 511 F.3d 216 , 224 (1st Cir. 2007) )

Richard v. Regional School Unit 57

First Circuit, 2018

lack of hostility prior to protected conduct supports inference of retaliatory animus

Richard v. Regional School Unit 57

First Circuit, 2018

using temporal proximity to find factual error in court's ultimate conclusion regarding causation

Richard v. Regional School Unit 57

First Circuit, 2018

using temporal proximity to find factual error in court's ultimate conclusion regarding causation

Richard v. Regional School Unit 57

First Circuit, 2018

lack of hostility prior to protected conduct supports inference of retaliatory animus

Ortiz v. Fed. Bureau of Prisons

District of Columbia, 2017

"our law is that temporal proximity alone can suffice to meet the relatively light burden of establishing a prima facie case of retaliation"

Consedine v. Willimansett East SNF

D. Massachusetts, 2016

“[O]ur law is that temporal proximity alone can suffice to ‘meet the relatively light burden of establishing a prima facie case of retaliation.’ ”

DeCaire v. Mukasey

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack