DeButts & Daggett v. Vandiver & Co.

129 Ala. 666
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedNovember 15, 1900
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 129 Ala. 666 (DeButts & Daggett v. Vandiver & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
DeButts & Daggett v. Vandiver & Co., 129 Ala. 666 (Ala. 1900).

Opinion

'This was an action brought by the: ■ appellees, W. P. Vandiver & Company, against the appellants, to recover damages for breach o¡f -warranty in the sale by the defendant of ’certain fish to the plaintiffs. The canse was.tried by the court without the intervention of a jury!,. Judgment oms.rendered'in'fayor of the plaintiffs, and fro'm'tliis judgment the defendants prosecute the present .appeal.

In the transcript there is no final judgment shown, except in the hill of exceptions. The court holds that this is insufficient to authenticate' á‘ judgment, since it mus.t otherwise appear of record.—Petty v. Dill, 53 Ala. 641; 3 Brick. Dig., 78, §§ 7, 8.

'Tile ap^baT is 'dismissed.

Opinion by

Sharpe; J..

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Central of Georgia Ry. Co. v. Gillis Mule Co.
103 So. 906 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1925)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
129 Ala. 666, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/debutts-daggett-v-vandiver-co-ala-1900.