Debose v. State

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Debose v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 237 So. 3d 1059
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 29, 2015·No. 13-2119·Published

Opinion

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Opinion filed April 29, 2015. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D13-2119 Lower Tribunal No. 11-13229 ________________

Arthur Debose, Appellant,

vs.

The State of Florida, Appellee.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Maria Elena Verde, Judge.

Carlos J. Martinez, Public Defender, and Manuel Alvarez, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Marlon J. Weiss, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before ROTHENBERG, EMAS, and SCALES, JJ.

ROTHENBERG, J.

The defendant, Arthur Debose, appeals his convictions for second degree murder with a firearm and unlawful possession of a firearm while engaged in a

criminal offense. The sole issue the defendant raises on appeal is that he was

denied effective assistance of trial counsel. As the claimed ineffectiveness is not

apparent on the face of the record, we affirm without prejudice to the defendant to

file a timely postconviction motion pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure

3.850. See Kidd v. State, 978 So. 2d 868, 868-69 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008); Desire v.

State, 928 So. 2d 1256, 1257 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Debose v. State, (Fla. Ct. App. 2015).

Debose v. State (Debose v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kidd v. State
978 So. 2d 868 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2008)
Desire v. State
928 So. 2d 1256 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)