Debose v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Debose v. State

163 So. 3d 715, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 6207, 2015 WL 1944961

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 29, 2015·No. No. 3D13-2119·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ROTHENBERG, J.

The defendant, Arthur Debose, appeals his convictions for second degree murder with a firearm and unlawful possession of a firearm while engaged in a criminal offense. The sole issue the defendant raises on appeal is that he was denied effective assistance of trial counsel. As the claimed ineffectiveness is not apparent on the face of the record, we affirm without prejudice to the defendant to file a timely postcon-viction motion pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. See Kidd v. State, 978 So.2d 868, 868-69 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008); Desire v. State, 928 So.2d 1256, 1257 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ROTHENBERG, J.

The defendant, Arthur Debose, appeals his convictions for second degree murder with a firearm and unlawful possession of a firearm while engaged in a criminal offense. The sole issue the defendant raises on appeal is that he was denied effective assistance of trial counsel. As the claimed ineffectiveness is not apparent on the face of the record, we affirm without prejudice to the defendant to file a timely postcon-viction motion pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. See Kidd v. State, 978 So.2d 868, 868-69 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008); Desire v. State, 928 So.2d 1256, 1257 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006).

Affirmed.

Debose v. State, 163 So. 3d 715, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 6207, 2015 WL 1944961 (Fla. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

163 So. 3d 715 (Debose v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related