Debose v. State
This text of 163 So. 3d 715 (Debose v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The defendant, Arthur Debose, appeals his convictions for second degree murder with a firearm and unlawful possession of a firearm while engaged in a criminal offense. The sole issue the defendant raises on appeal is that he was denied effective assistance of trial counsel. As the claimed ineffectiveness is not apparent on the face of the record, we affirm without prejudice to the defendant to file a timely postcon-viction motion pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. See Kidd v. State, 978 So.2d 868, 868-69 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008); Desire v. State, 928 So.2d 1256, 1257 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
163 So. 3d 715, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 6207, 2015 WL 1944961, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/debose-v-state-fladistctapp-2015.