DeBolt v. Superior Court
38 P.2d 169, 2 Cal. App. 2d 619, 1934 Cal. App. LEXIS 1476
CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal
DecidedDecember 5, 1934
DocketCiv. No. 9983
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 38 P.2d 169 (DeBolt v. Superior Court) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
DeBolt v. Superior Court, 38 P.2d 169, 2 Cal. App. 2d 619, 1934 Cal. App. LEXIS 1476 (Cal. Ct. App. 1934).
Opinion
One of the defendants in an action which was decided adversely to her seeks by a petition in mandamus to have restored to her bill of exceptions upon appeal matters stricken therefrom by the trial court. Section 652 of the Code of Civil Procedure prescribes the procedure to be taken in such a case. A peremptory writ denied.
Grail, J., and Scott, J., pro tern., concurred.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
DeBolt v. Superior Court
2 Cal. App. 2d 619 (California Court of Appeal, 1934)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
38 P.2d 169, 2 Cal. App. 2d 619, 1934 Cal. App. LEXIS 1476, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/debolt-v-superior-court-calctapp-1934.