DeBergalis v. DeBergalis

156 A.D.2d 963
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 20, 1989·No. Appeal No. 1·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: The record supports the determination of the Judicial Hearing Officer that defendant’s conduct prolonged this litigation, thereby justifying the award of counsel fees in the amount of $7,250.98 (see, DeCabrera v Cabrera-Rósete, 70 NY2d 879; Rados v Rados, 133 AD2d 536). Contrary to defendant’s assertion, "[ijndigency is not a prerequisite to an award of counsel fees” (DeCabrera v CabreraRosete, supra, at 881).

We reject defendant’s contention that the denial of plaintiff’s application for an award of temporary maintenance during the pendency of the action precludes or operates as a bar to the award of retroactive maintenance in the final order (see, Domestic Relations Law § 236 [B] [6] [a]).

Finally, we conclude that, on this record, the award of child support in the amount of $100 per week for the parties’ infant daughter is warranted in view of the fact that plaintiff, who is employed full time, pays child care expenses in the sum of $90 per week. (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Heffron, J.H.O. — equitable distribution and support.) Present —Denman, J. P., Boomer, Pine, Balio and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DeBergalis v. DeBergalis, 156 A.D.2d 963 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1989).

156 A.D.2d 963 (DeBergalis v. DeBergalis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wipperman v. Wipperman
277 A.D.2d 1040 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
DeBergalis v. DeBergalis
156 A.D.2d 963 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)