DeArmond v. Department of Revenue

Oregon Supreme Court

DeArmond v. Department of Revenue

968 P.2d 1280, 328 Or. 60, 1998 Ore. LEXIS 1024

CourtOregon Supreme Court

DecidedDecember 3, 1998

DocketOTC 4014; SC S44101

StatusPublished

Cited by7 cases

This text of 968 P.2d 1280 (DeArmond v. Department of Revenue) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oregon Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

DeArmond v. Department of Revenue, 968 P.2d 1280, 328 Or. 60, 1998 Ore. LEXIS 1024 (Or. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

*62 PER CURIAM

This is an appeal from the Oregon Tax Court. The Department of Revenue (department) denied plaintiffs’ (taxpayers) claim for a 1990 personal income tax refund. The Tax Court affirmed. DeArmond v. Dept. of Rev., 14 OTR 112 (1997). Taxpayers appeal.

The facts are undisputed. Taxpayers are Oregon residents. Mr. DeArmond was Chairman of the Board of Directors of a Subchapter S corporation doing business in Oregon and Idaho. Three days after the period for filing a tax refund claim in Oregon had expired, taxpayers received notice from Idaho that they owed additional income taxes to Idaho for 1990. Taxpayers paid the taxes due to Idaho and then filed an amended 1990 Oregon income tax return claiming a tax credit and resulting refund. The department denied the refund, because ORS 305.270(2) and ORS 314.415(l)(b) require claims for refunds to be filed within three years from the date that the original Oregon return was filed. The department concluded that it had no authority to waive, extend, or ignore the statutory deadline. Taxpayers challenged that conclusion on various grounds.

We have concluded that the facts of this case are such that an extended opinion would be unlikely to benefit the bench, bar, or public. We have considered each of taxpayers’ arguments and have determined that none is well taken.

The judgment of the Tax Court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*62 PER CURIAM

This is an appeal from the Oregon Tax Court. The Department of Revenue (department) denied plaintiffs’ (taxpayers) claim for a 1990 personal income tax refund. The Tax Court affirmed. DeArmond v. Dept. of Rev., 14 OTR 112 (1997). Taxpayers appeal.

The facts are undisputed. Taxpayers are Oregon residents. Mr. DeArmond was Chairman of the Board of Directors of a Subchapter S corporation doing business in Oregon and Idaho. Three days after the period for filing a tax refund claim in Oregon had expired, taxpayers received notice from Idaho that they owed additional income taxes to Idaho for 1990. Taxpayers paid the taxes due to Idaho and then filed an amended 1990 Oregon income tax return claiming a tax credit and resulting refund. The department denied the refund, because ORS 305.270(2) and ORS 314.415(l)(b) require claims for refunds to be filed within three years from the date that the original Oregon return was filed. The department concluded that it had no authority to waive, extend, or ignore the statutory deadline. Taxpayers challenged that conclusion on various grounds.

We have concluded that the facts of this case are such that an extended opinion would be unlikely to benefit the bench, bar, or public. We have considered each of taxpayers’ arguments and have determined that none is well taken.

The judgment of the Tax Court is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

968 P.2d 1280, 328 Or. 60, 1998 Ore. LEXIS 1024, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dearmond-v-department-of-revenue-or-1998.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack