Dearborn Mid-West Company, LLC v. FM Sylvan, Inc.

District Court, E.D. Michigan·Decided October 11, 2022·No. 2:22-cv-12114·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION DEARBORN MID-WEST COMPANY, LLC, and DEARBORN HOLDING COMPANY, LLC, Case No. 22-cv-12114-RHC-EAS Plaintiff, Hon. Robert H. Cleland v.

F M SYLVAN, INC., STEPHEN DORCHAK, ERNEST PANDOLFI, and IBRAHIM EID,

Defendants. STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER Pursuant to Rule 26(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the below stipulation of the parties, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. This Stipulated Protective Order (“Order”) shall govern all party and non-party discovery authorized by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure including documents, electronically stored information (“ESI”), responses to subpoenas, depositions, deposition exhibits, interrogatory responses, responses to document requests, responses to requests for admission, court testimony, matters of evidence, and other disclosed information (collectively, “Discovery Material”) produced or disclosed by any party or nonparty (the “Producing Party”) in connection with this litigation. 2. Any Producing Party may designate any Discovery Material as “Confidential” if such party, in good faith, believes such Discovery Material contains proprietary information of the Producing Party, including trade secrets or

other confidential, non-public technical information, research and development information, patent applications, trademark applications, commercial, financial, budgeting and/or accounting information, information about existing customers, marketing studies, performance and projections, business strategies, decisions and/or negotiations, personnel compensation, evaluations and other employment information, as well as confidential and proprietary information about affiliates, parents, subsidiaries and third parties with whom the Producing Party has or has had a business relationship. The “Confidential” category shall be invoked by a Producing Party only relative to Discovery Material that contains information reasonably believed to fall within the definition of protectable information under

Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(c). A party to this action may also designate Discovery Material produced by third parties as “Confidential” if it meets the requirements of this paragraph as to that party. 3. Any Producing Party may designate any Discovery Material as “Highly Confidential – Attorney Eyes Only” if such party, in good faith, believes such Discovery Material contains particularly sensitive information, such as internal technical information describing products and processes that the Producing Party maintains as confidential, financial information, customer lists, identification of customers, amount or source of any income, profits, losses, or expenditures of any person, firm, partnership, corporation, or other organization, the possession of which might give another party in possession of it the opportunity to obtain a

competitive advantage. A party to this action may also designate Discovery Material produced by third parties as “Highly Confidential – Attorney Eyes Only”

if it meets the requirements of this paragraph as to that party. Parties who enter into this Order are not prohibited from challenging any “Highly Confidential – Attorney Eyes Only” designations, either among counsel or in filings with the Court. 4. Except as may be expressly permitted under this Order or as otherwise required by law, materials designated as “Confidential” or “Highly Confidential – Attorney Eyes Only” (collectively, “Confidential Information”) shall not be used or disclosed by any person or entity for any purpose whatsoever other than the preparation for and trial of this litigation, including any appeals, all of which shall be governed by this Protective Order.

5. The designation of information as “Confidential” or “Highly Confidential – Attorney Eyes Only” for purposes of this Order shall be made in the following manner: (a) In the case of documents or other materials (apart from depositions or other pretrial testimony): by affixing the legend “Confidential” or “Highly Confidential – Attorney Eyes Only” to each page for which such designation is desired; and (b) In the case of depositions or other pretrial proceedings: (i) by a statement on the record, by counsel, at the time of such disclosure, or (ii) by written notice, sent by counsel to all parties within twenty-one (21) days after receiving a copy of the certified transcript thereof, but only if the designating party

orders the transcript within five (5) days after the deposition or other pretrial proceeding. Notwithstanding the foregoing, all testimony given at a deposition or

pretrial proceeding and each transcript of a deposition or pretrial proceeding shall be presumptively treated as “Highly Confidential – Attorney Eyes Only” material for a period of twenty-one (21) days following receipt of the certified transcript thereof (provided at least one of the parties orders the transcript within five (5) days after the deposition or other pretrial proceeding). Within said twenty-one (21) days, the party claiming confidentiality may inform the other party in writing of the transcript pages which that party designates as “Confidential” or “Highly Confidential – Attorney Eyes Only.” Thereafter, pages so designated will be subject to the relevant provisions of this Order. If no such designation is made by a party within twenty-one (21) days after receipt of the certified transcript

(provided the transcript was ordered within five (5) days after the deposition or pretrial proceeding), or if neither party orders the transcript within five (5) days after the deposition or pretrial proceeding, the transcript shall be considered not to contain Confidential Information. With respect to proceedings recorded by official court reporters of the Court, nothing herein shall be deemed to alter the obligations of counsel under Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2 or the Procedures Governing the Electronic Availability and Redaction of Transcripts (Revised September 2009) of the Court (“Procedures”) (including but not limited to the requirement that a motion be timely filed to secure redaction of material beyond that provided for in paragraph 4 of the Procedures). 6. Discovery Material designated as “Confidential” may be disclosed

only to the following: (a) The named parties to this action, provided the party or its authorized

representative signs an Undertaking in the form attached hereto as Exhibit 1. (b) Counsel of record for the parties in this litigation, including their supporting personnel (e.g., clerical, secretarial, and paralegal personnel) to whom the “Confidential” material is provided and to whom disclosure is reasonably deemed necessary by said counsel during the course of this litigation. Said counsel and such supporting personnel shall hold the “Confidential” material in confidence and shall not disclose it to any other person, directly or indirectly, not authorized to receive it under this Order; (c) Experts or independent consultants engaged by outside counsel or by

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dearborn Mid-West Company, LLC v. FM Sylvan, Inc., (E.D. Mich. 2022).

Dearborn Mid-West Company, LLC v. FM Sylvan, Inc. (Dearborn Mid-West Company, LLC v. FM Sylvan, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related