Deandre Arnold v. Mellisa Brooks

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedDecember 6, 2021
DocketA22D0134
StatusPublished

This text of Deandre Arnold v. Mellisa Brooks (Deandre Arnold v. Mellisa Brooks) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Deandre Arnold v. Mellisa Brooks, (Ga. Ct. App. 2021).

Opinion

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________ December 03, 2021

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A22D0134. DEANDRE ARNOLD v. MELISSA BROOKS et al.

Acting pro se, Deandre Arnold filed a Poverty Affidavit alleging pauper status and a civil action against Melissa Brooks, in her individual and official capacity as City Clerk for the City of Hampton, and others in October 2020, alleging violations of the Georgia Open Records Act. A hearing was scheduled, but before it could occur, Arnold filed a motion to recuse/disqualify the trial judge assigned to the case, alleging the judge was biased. The trial court denied the motion, and Arnold filed this application for discretionary appeal. We, however, lack jurisdiction. The trial court’s order appears to be an interlocutory ruling. Thus, pretermitting whether an application for discretionary review was required, Arnold was required to follow the interlocutory appeal procedures set forth in OCGA § 5-6-34 (b) to appeal this order. See Bailey v. Bailey, 266 Ga. 832, 832- 833 (471 SE2d 213) (1996); Murphy v. Murphy, 322 Ga. App. 829, 830 (747 SE2d 21) (2013) (appeal from an interlocutory order denying a motion to recuse requires an application for interlocutory review). Pursuant to OCGA § 5-6-34 (b), an applicant for interlocutory appeal must obtain a certificate of immediate review from the trial court within ten days of entry of the order to be appealed and file an application for interlocutory appeal in this Court within ten days of entry of the certificate. In light of Arnold’s failure to comply with the interlocutory appeal procedure, we are without jurisdiction to consider this application, which is hereby DISMISSED. See Bailey, 266 Ga. at 833. Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ 12/03/2021 I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bailey v. Bailey
471 S.E.2d 213 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1996)
Murphy v. Murphy
747 S.E.2d 21 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2013)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Deandre Arnold v. Mellisa Brooks, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/deandre-arnold-v-mellisa-brooks-gactapp-2021.