Dean v. State

183 So. 157, 133 Fla. 797, 1938 Fla. LEXIS 1043
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided August 1, 1938·Published

Opinions

Buford, J.

—-The opinion written by Mr. Chief Justice Ellis was written for a majority opinion and is agreed to except that we think there was ample substantive evidence if believed by the jury to support the verdict. If the statements made by the alleged victim as to what transpired were true the accused was clearly guilty of the offense charged. The judy indicated by its verdict that it believed those statements and the trial Judge approved the findings of fact in order denying new trial. The judgment should be affirmed.

So ordered.

Whitfield and Brown, J. J., concur. Ellis, C. J., and Chapman, J., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dean v. State, 183 So. 157, 133 Fla. 797, 1938 Fla. LEXIS 1043 (Fla. 1938).

183 So. 157 (Dean v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Waldrop v. State
126 So. 760 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1930)
Tuberson v. State
26 Fla. 472 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1890)
Hollis v. State
27 Fla. 387 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1891)
Disney v. State
73 So. 598 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1916)
Bailey v. State
79 So. 730 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1918)