Dean v. State

187 So. 161, 136 Fla. 462, 1938 Fla. LEXIS 1363
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedAugust 1, 1938
StatusPublished

This text of 187 So. 161 (Dean v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dean v. State, 187 So. 161, 136 Fla. 462, 1938 Fla. LEXIS 1363 (Fla. 1938).

Opinions

Buford, J.

— The opinion written by Mr. Chief Justice Ellis was written for a majority opinion and is agreed to except that we think there was ample substantive evidence if believed by the jury to support the verdict. If the statements made by the alleged victim as to what transpired were true the accused was clearly guilty of the offense charged. The jury indicated by its verdict that it believed those statements and the trial Judge approved the findings of fact in order denying new trial. The judgment should be affirmed.

So ordered.

Whitfield and Brown, J. J., concur. Ellis, C. J., and Chapman, J., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Waldrop v. State
126 So. 760 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1930)
Tuberson v. State
26 Fla. 472 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1890)
Hollis v. State
27 Fla. 387 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1891)
Disney v. State
73 So. 598 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1916)
Bailey v. State
79 So. 730 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1918)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
187 So. 161, 136 Fla. 462, 1938 Fla. LEXIS 1363, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dean-v-state-fla-1938.