Dean v. Lafayette

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided March 14, 2023·No. 7:21-cv-08320·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK JOAQUNDEAN, SS

Plaintiff, -against- 21 CIVIL 8320 (VB) JUDGMENT JEREMY DOBERMAN and MARC WOHLGEMUTH, Defendants. wenn K It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Opinion and Order dated March 13, 2023, Defendants’ motion to dismiss and request for a filing injunction are GRANTED. To be clear, Plaintiff is prohibited from commencing any new lawsuits against defendants Jeremy Doberman and March Wohlgemuth, arising from the same facts alleged in the amended complaint and opposition, absent prior permission of the Court. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purposes of an appeal. Cf. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962); accordingly, the case 1s closed. Dated: New York, New York March 14, 2023 RUBY J. KRAJICK

Clerkof Court BY: K, MANGO Deputy Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dean v. Lafayette, (S.D.N.Y. 2023).

Dean v. Lafayette (Dean v. Lafayette) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Coppedge v. United States
369 U.S. 438 (Supreme Court, 1962)