De La Cruz v. Dept. of Rev.
This text of De La Cruz v. Dept. of Rev. (De La Cruz v. Dept. of Rev.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oregon Tax Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE OREGON TAX COURT MAGISTRATE DIVISION Income Tax
JOSE DE LA CRUZ, ) ) Plaintiff, ) TC-MD 160019N ) v. ) ) DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, ) State of Oregon, ) ) Defendant. ) FINAL DECISION1
This matter is before the court on Defendant’s Recommendation , filed June 6, 2016, and
Plaintiff’s letter in response to Defendant’s Recommendation, filed June 16, 2016.
Plaintiff filed his Complaint on January 15, 2016, appealing Defendant’s assessment of
taxes for the 2012, 2013, and 2014 tax years. In its Recommendation, Defendant offered
Plaintiff “partial relief,” resulting in a tax-to-pay of $510 for the 2012 tax year, a tax-to-pay of
$546 for the 2013 tax year, and a tax-to-pay of $561 for the 2014 tax year. (Recommendation at
1.) In response to Defendant’s Recommendation, Plaintiff’s representative wrote that Plaintiff
“can agree to this recommendation and agree[s] to pay” the tax-to-pay amounts identified by
Defendant. (Ptf’s Ltr at1, June 16, 2016.)
Plaintiff’s representative also wrote, “I understand the recommendation can’t really
address the penalties but we still want to request relief from the penalties.” (Id.) ORS
305.145(4) vests Defendant with the discretionary authority to waive penalties it otherwise has
the authority to collect. That discretionary authority lies solely with Defendant, not with this
court. Pelett v. Dept. of Rev., 11 OTR 364, 365–66 (1990); see also ORS 305.560(1)(a).
1 This Final Decision incorporates without change the court’s Decision, entered June 20, 2016. The court did not receive a statement of costs and disbursements within 14 days after its Decision was entered. See Tax Court Rule–Magistrate Division (TCR–MD) 16 C(1).
FINAL DECISION TC-MD 160019N 1 Plaintiff’s request for relief from penalties imposed by Defendant is therefore denied. Now,
therefore,
IT IS THE DECISION OF THIS COURT that, based on the agreement of the parties,
Plaintiff’s tax-to-pay for the 2012 tax year is $510; Plaintiff’s tax-to-pay for the 2013 tax year is
$546; and Plaintiff’s tax-to-pay for the 2014 tax year is $561.
IT IS FURTHER DECIDED that Plaintiff’s request for relief from penalties imposed by
Defendant is denied.
Dated this day of July 2016.
ALLISON R. BOOMER MAGISTRATE
If you want to appeal this Final Decision, file a complaint in the Regular Division of the Oregon Tax Court, by mailing to: 1163 State Street, Salem, OR 97301-2563; or by hand delivery to: Fourth Floor, 1241 State Street, Salem, OR.
Your complaint must be submitted within 60 days after the date of the Final Decision or this Final Decision cannot be changed. TCR-MD 19 B.
This document was filed and entered on July 11, 2016.
FINAL DECISION TC-MD 160019N 2
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
De La Cruz v. Dept. of Rev., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/de-la-cruz-v-dept-of-rev-ortc-2016.