D.D. v. State

795 So. 2d 177, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 12529, 2001 WL 1014020
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in D.D. v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 6549
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 6, 2001·No. Nos. 1D00-3735, 1D00-3960, 1D00-3962·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the revocations of appellant’s community control and adjudications of delinquency in these appeals in which the public defender filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). We write only to correct an apparent scrivener’s errors in the written disposition orders to reflect that appellant’s terms of commitment are for indeterminate terms not to exceed his nineteenth birthday or the maximum allowed by law, whichever occurs first. See M.C.P. v. State, 732 So.2d 339, 340 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998).

BARFIELD, WOLF and LEWIS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

D.D. v. State, 795 So. 2d 177, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 12529, 2001 WL 1014020 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

795 So. 2d 177 (D.D. v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
M.C.P. v. State
732 So. 2d 339 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)