D.D. v. State

795 So. 2d 177, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 12529, 2001 WL 1014020
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedSeptember 6, 2001
DocketNos. 1D00-3735, 1D00-3960, 1D00-3962
StatusPublished

This text of 795 So. 2d 177 (D.D. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
D.D. v. State, 795 So. 2d 177, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 12529, 2001 WL 1014020 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the revocations of appellant’s community control and adjudications of delinquency in these appeals in which the public defender filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). We write only to correct an apparent scrivener’s errors in the written disposition orders to reflect that appellant’s terms of commitment are for indeterminate terms not to exceed his nineteenth birthday or the maximum allowed by law, whichever occurs first. See M.C.P. v. State, 732 So.2d 339, 340 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998).

BARFIELD, WOLF and LEWIS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
M.C.P. v. State
732 So. 2d 339 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
795 So. 2d 177, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 12529, 2001 WL 1014020, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dd-v-state-fladistctapp-2001.