D.D. v. State
801 So. 2d 216, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 17094, 2001 WL 1539122
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 5, 2001·No. No. 4D01-1775·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
We affirm the conviction but remand for resentencing as the State agrees we must, because the court erred in imposing an indefinite term of probation. Such a juvenile sentence cannot be longer than the maximum term an adult could serve for the same offense. J.H. v. State, 760 So.2d 250 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
D.D. v. State, 801 So. 2d 216, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 17094, 2001 WL 1539122 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).
801 So. 2d 216 (D.D. v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Leathers v. State
801 So. 2d 216 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)