DBI Beverage, Inc. v. Navistar International Corporation

N.D. Illinois

DBI Beverage, Inc. v. Navistar International Corporation

DecidedMay 1, 2018

Docket1:18-cv-02972

StatusUnknown

This text of DBI Beverage, Inc. v. Navistar International Corporation (DBI Beverage, Inc. v. Navistar International Corporation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, N.D. Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

DBI Beverage, Inc. v. Navistar International Corporation, (N.D. Ill. 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

Joan B. Gottschall Judge Michael T. Mason UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL on FILED #1:18-cv-02972 CAE MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION May 01, 2018

IN RE: NAVISTAR MAXXFORCE ENGINES MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION MDL No. 2590

(SEE ATTACHED SCHEDULE)

CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO —21)

On December 17, 2014, the Panel transferred 7 civil action(s) to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407. See 67 F.Supp.3d 1382 (J.P.M.L. 2014). Since that time, 24 additional action(s) have been transferred to the Northern District of Illinois. With the consent of that court, all such actions have been assigned to the Honorable Joan B. Gottschall. It appears that the action(s) on this conditional transfer order involve questions of fact that are common to the actions previously transferred to the Northern District of Illinois and assigned to Judge Gottschall. Pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Rules of Procedure of the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, the action(s) on the attached schedule are transferred under 28 U.S.C. § 1407 to the Northern District of Illinois for the reasons stated in the order of December 17, 2014, and, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Joan B. Gottschall. This order does not become effective until it is filed in the Office of the Clerk of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois. The transmittal of this order to said Clerk shall be stayed 7 days from the entry thereof. If any party files a notice of opposition with the Clerk of the Panel within this 7-day period, the stay will be continued until further order of the Panel.

pending at his timo, the me = OI FOR THE PANEL: CLERK'S OFFICE aeRO ASL DD —__ A TRUE_.COPY-ATTEST Jeffery N. Liith? HOMAS#G2 BROTON, CLER Clerk of the Panel By;’si JESSICA: RAMOS DERPUPOCLERK U.S. DISTRIGHCOURT □□□□□ DISTRICT OFYERINGES | Apri 26;;20-18

IN RE: NAVISTAR MAXXFORCE ENGINES MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION MDL No. 2590

SCHEDULE CTO—21 — TAG—-ALONG ACTIONS

DIST DIV. C.A.NO. CASE CAPTION

CALIFORNIA EASTERN

CAE > 1800730 oe Beverage, Inc. et al v. Navistar International orporation et al

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Joan B. Gottschall Judge Michael T. Mason UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL on FILED #1:18-cv-02972 CAE MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION May 01, 2018

IN RE: NAVISTAR MAXXFORCE ENGINES MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION MDL No. 2590

(SEE ATTACHED SCHEDULE)

CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO —21)

On December 17, 2014, the Panel transferred 7 civil action(s) to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407. See 67 F.Supp.3d 1382 (J.P.M.L. 2014). Since that time, 24 additional action(s) have been transferred to the Northern District of Illinois. With the consent of that court, all such actions have been assigned to the Honorable Joan B. Gottschall. It appears that the action(s) on this conditional transfer order involve questions of fact that are common to the actions previously transferred to the Northern District of Illinois and assigned to Judge Gottschall. Pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Rules of Procedure of the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, the action(s) on the attached schedule are transferred under 28 U.S.C. § 1407 to the Northern District of Illinois for the reasons stated in the order of December 17, 2014, and, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Joan B. Gottschall. This order does not become effective until it is filed in the Office of the Clerk of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois. The transmittal of this order to said Clerk shall be stayed 7 days from the entry thereof. If any party files a notice of opposition with the Clerk of the Panel within this 7-day period, the stay will be continued until further order of the Panel.

pending at his timo, the me = OI FOR THE PANEL: CLERK'S OFFICE aeRO ASL DD —__ A TRUE_.COPY-ATTEST Jeffery N. Liith? HOMAS#G2 BROTON, CLER Clerk of the Panel By;’si JESSICA: RAMOS DERPUPOCLERK U.S. DISTRIGHCOURT □□□□□ DISTRICT OFYERINGES | Apri 26;;20-18

IN RE: NAVISTAR MAXXFORCE ENGINES MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION MDL No. 2590

SCHEDULE CTO—21 — TAG—-ALONG ACTIONS

DIST DIV. C.A.NO. CASE CAPTION

CALIFORNIA EASTERN

CAE > 1800730 oe Beverage, Inc. et al v. Navistar International orporation et al

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

DBI Beverage, Inc. v. Navistar International Corporation, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dbi-beverage-inc-v-navistar-international-corporation-ilnd-2018.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack