DB v. State
This text of 848 So. 2d 1219 (DB v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
D.B., A Juvenile, Petitioner,
v.
The STATE of Florida, and George Laflam, Superintendent, Miami-Dade Juvenile Detention Center, Respondents.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Carlos Gonzalez, Assistant Public Defender, for petitioner.
Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, and Andrea D. England, Assistant Attorney General, for respondents.
Before COPE and SHEVIN, JJ., and NESBITT, Senior Judge.
Confession of Error
PER CURIAM.
D.B. petitions for a writ of habeas corpus, seeking release from home detention care with an electronic monitor. In its response, the State confesses error. The State acknowledges that D.B. does not qualify for home detention based on the risk assessment instrument. See § 985.213(2), Fla. Stat. (2002). The statute permits a more restrictive placement than that indicated by the risk assessment instrument, but to do so, "the court shall state, in writing, clear and convincing reasons for such placement." Id. § 985.215(2)(j). No such reasons were given in this case. Accordingly we grant the petition for writ of habeas corpus and direct that D.B. be released from home detention. See K.C. v. Taylor, 696 So.2d 858 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997); D.G.H. v. Gnat, 682 So.2d 210 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996); cf. R.G. v. State, 817 So.2d 1019 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002) *1220 (discussing statute). The court may revisit the issue if there is a basis to do so.
Petition granted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
848 So. 2d 1219, 2003 WL 21536984, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/db-v-state-fladistctapp-2003.