Dayton Bar Assn. v. Seall

Ohio Supreme Court

Dayton Bar Assn. v. Seall

1999 Ohio 237, 87 Ohio St. 3d 1203

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedSeptember 20, 1999

Docket1997-2258

StatusPublished

This text of 1999 Ohio 237 (Dayton Bar Assn. v. Seall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dayton Bar Assn. v. Seall, 1999 Ohio 237, 87 Ohio St. 3d 1203 (Ohio 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 87 Ohio St.3d 1203.]

DAYTON BAR ASSOCIATION v. SEALL. [Cite as Dayton Bar Assn. v. Seall, 1999-Ohio-237.] (No. 97-2258—Submitted and decided September 20, 1999.) ON APPLICATION FOR REINSTATEMENT. __________________ {¶ 1} This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an application for reinstatement by respondent William H. Seall, a.k.a. William Herbert Seall, Attorney Registration No. 0018722, last known business address in Dayton, Ohio. {¶ 2} The court coming now to consider its order of March 25, 1998, wherein the court, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(6)(B)(3), suspended respondent for a period of one year with credit for time served under the interim suspension in Supreme Court case No. 96-2561, In re William H. Seall, finds that respondent has substantially complied with that order and with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(10)(A). Therefore, {¶ 3} IT IS ORDERED by this court that William H. Seall, a.k.a. William Herbert Seall, be and hereby is reinstated to the practice of law in the state of Ohio. {¶ 4} IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that respondent bear the costs of publication. {¶ 5} For earlier case, see Dayton Bar Assn. v. Seall (1998), 81 Ohio St.3d 280, 690 N.E.2d 1271. MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. __________________

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 87 Ohio St.3d 1203.]

DAYTON BAR ASSOCIATION v. SEALL. [Cite as Dayton Bar Assn. v. Seall, 1999-Ohio-237.] (No. 97-2258—Submitted and decided September 20, 1999.) ON APPLICATION FOR REINSTATEMENT. __________________ {¶ 1} This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an application for reinstatement by respondent William H. Seall, a.k.a. William Herbert Seall, Attorney Registration No. 0018722, last known business address in Dayton, Ohio. {¶ 2} The court coming now to consider its order of March 25, 1998, wherein the court, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(6)(B)(3), suspended respondent for a period of one year with credit for time served under the interim suspension in Supreme Court case No. 96-2561, In re William H. Seall, finds that respondent has substantially complied with that order and with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(10)(A). Therefore, {¶ 3} IT IS ORDERED by this court that William H. Seall, a.k.a. William Herbert Seall, be and hereby is reinstated to the practice of law in the state of Ohio. {¶ 4} IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that respondent bear the costs of publication. {¶ 5} For earlier case, see Dayton Bar Assn. v. Seall (1998), 81 Ohio St.3d 280, 690 N.E.2d 1271. MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. __________________

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1999 Ohio 237, 87 Ohio St. 3d 1203, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dayton-bar-assn-v-seall-ohio-1999.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack