Dayanara Baker v. the State of Texas
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-25-00866-CR
Dayanara Baker, Appellant v.
The State of Texas, Appellee
FROM THE 433RD DISTRICT COURT OF COMAL COUNTY, NO. CR2018-778D, THE HONORABLE DIB WALDRIP, JUDGE PRESIDING
MEMORANDUM OPINION
This Court abated Dayanara Baker’s pro se appeal on December 10, 2025, and remanded the case to the trial court for entry of a certification of Baker’s right of appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2) (setting forth general rule requiring trial court’s certification of defendant’s right of appeal each time it enters judgment of guilt or other appealable order), (d) (requiring that record in defendant’s appeal include trial court’s certification of defendant’s right of appeal), 44.4 (addressing remediable error). The trial court has since certified that the underlying case is pending and that it has entered no appealable order. Accordingly, we lift the abatement, reinstate this appeal, and dismiss it for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2).
Darlene Byrne, Chief Justice
Before Chief Justice Byrne, Justices Theofanis and Crump Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction
Filed: January 23, 2026 Do Not Publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Dayanara Baker v. the State of Texas (Dayanara Baker v. the State of Texas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.