Dayanara Baker v. the State of Texas
This text of Dayanara Baker v. the State of Texas (Dayanara Baker v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-25-00866-CR
Dayanara Baker, Appellant
v.
The State of Texas, Appellee
FROM THE 433RD DISTRICT COURT OF COMAL COUNTY, NO. CR2018-778D, THE HONORABLE DIB WALDRIP, JUDGE PRESIDING
MEMORANDUM OPINION
This Court abated Dayanara Baker’s pro se appeal on December 10, 2025, and
remanded the case to the trial court for entry of a certification of Baker’s right of appeal. See
Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2) (setting forth general rule requiring trial court’s certification of
defendant’s right of appeal each time it enters judgment of guilt or other appealable order),
(d) (requiring that record in defendant’s appeal include trial court’s certification of defendant’s
right of appeal), 44.4 (addressing remediable error). The trial court has since certified that the
underlying case is pending and that it has entered no appealable order. Accordingly, we lift the
abatement, reinstate this appeal, and dismiss it for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P.
25.2(a)(2).
__________________________________________ Darlene Byrne, Chief Justice
Before Chief Justice Byrne, Justices Theofanis and Crump
Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction Filed: January 23, 2026
Do Not Publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Dayanara Baker v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dayanara-baker-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2026.