Dayanara Baker v. the State of Texas
This text of Dayanara Baker v. the State of Texas (Dayanara Baker v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-25-00866-CR
Dayanara Baker, Appellant
v.
The State of Texas, Appellee
FROM THE 433RD DISTRICT COURT OF COMAL COUNTY, NO. CR2018-778D, THE HONORABLE DIB WALDRIP, JUDGE PRESIDING
ORDER AND MEMORANDUM OPINION
PER CURIAM
Appellant Dayanara Baker, acting pro se, filed a notice of appeal on October 29,
2025, but the clerk’s record does not contain the trial court’s certification of her right of appeal.
See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d) (“If the defendant is the appellant, the record must include the trial
court’s certification of the defendant’s right of appeal under Rule 25.2(a)(2).”). The Comal
County district clerk filed a letter informing this Court that the record of this cause contains no
trial court certification.
Accordingly, we abate this appeal and remand the cause to the trial court for entry
of a certification of Baker’s right of appeal. See id. R. 25.2(a)(2), 44.4. A supplemental clerk’s
record containing the trial court’s certification shall be filed with this Court no later than
January 9, 2026. See id. R. 34.5(c)(2).
It is ordered on December 10, 2025. Before Chief Justice Byrne, Justices Crump and Ellis
Abated and Remanded
Filed: December 10, 2025
Do Not Publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Dayanara Baker v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dayanara-baker-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2025.