Day v. State
760 So. 2d 295, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 7384, 2000 WL 770531
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Day v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 770 So. 2d 1262 →
Opinion
Anthony James Day appeals the judgment and sentence imposed as a result of his violation of probation. We affirm the judgment and sentence without discussion. However, as noted by Day and conceded by the State, the trial court failed to enter a written order revoking Day’s probation. Thus, we remand this case to the trial court with directions to enter a probation order specifying the conditions of probation which Day violated. See Donley v. State, 557 So.2d 943 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990).
[296]*296Affirmed and remanded with instructions.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Day v. State, 760 So. 2d 295, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 7384, 2000 WL 770531 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).
760 So. 2d 295 (Day v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Donley v. State
557 So. 2d 943 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)