Day v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Day v. State

760 So. 2d 295, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 7384, 2000 WL 770531

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJune 16, 2000

DocketNo. 2D98-1576

StatusPublished

This text of 760 So. 2d 295 (Day v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Day v. State, 760 So. 2d 295, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 7384, 2000 WL 770531 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

SALCINES, Judge.

Anthony James Day appeals the judgment and sentence imposed as a result of his violation of probation. We affirm the judgment and sentence without discussion. However, as noted by Day and conceded by the State, the trial court failed to enter a written order revoking Day’s probation. Thus, we remand this case to the trial court with directions to enter a probation order specifying the conditions of probation which Day violated. See Donley v. State, 557 So.2d 943 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990).

[296]*296Affirmed and remanded with instructions.

CASANUEVA, A.C.J., and DANAHY, PAUL W., (Senior) Judge, Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SALCINES, Judge.

Anthony James Day appeals the judgment and sentence imposed as a result of his violation of probation. We affirm the judgment and sentence without discussion. However, as noted by Day and conceded by the State, the trial court failed to enter a written order revoking Day’s probation. Thus, we remand this case to the trial court with directions to enter a probation order specifying the conditions of probation which Day violated. See Donley v. State, 557 So.2d 943 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990).

[296]*296Affirmed and remanded with instructions.

CASANUEVA, A.C.J., and DANAHY, PAUL W., (Senior) Judge, Concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

760 So. 2d 295, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 7384, 2000 WL 770531, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/day-v-state-fladistctapp-2000.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack