Day v. Potter
2 Sarat. Ch. Sent. 61, 1842 N.Y. LEXIS 511
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Day v. Potter. Read the opinion of the Court — 9 Paige Ch. 645 →
Opinion
Order that original suit be revived and continued in the names of the complainants in the suplemental bil as the heirs at law of R. G. Day. But the order to be without prejudice to the right of the defendant, at the hearing, to controvert any of the allegations in the supplemental bill which are not admitted by his answer to the same. Complainants to have the same time to file a replication as they had at the time of giving notice of this application.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Day v. Potter, 2 Sarat. Ch. Sent. 61, 1842 N.Y. LEXIS 511 (N.Y. 1842).
2 Sarat. Ch. Sent. 61 (Day v. Potter) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.