Day v. Potter

New York Court of Chancery

Day v. Potter

2 Sarat. Ch. Sent. 61, 1842 N.Y. LEXIS 511

DecidedAugust 16, 1842

StatusPublished

This text of 2 Sarat. Ch. Sent. 61 (Day v. Potter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Chancery primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Day v. Potter, 2 Sarat. Ch. Sent. 61, 1842 N.Y. LEXIS 511 (N.Y. 1842).

Pincite

Opinion

Order that original suit be revived and continued in the names of the complainants in the suplemental bil as the heirs at law of R. G. Day. But the order to be without prejudice to the right of the defendant, at the hearing, to controvert any of the allegations in the supplemental bill which are not admitted by his answer to the same. Complainants to have the same time to file a replication as they had at the time of giving notice of this application.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order that original suit be revived and continued in the names of the complainants in the suplemental bil as the heirs at law of R. G. Day. But the order to be without prejudice to the right of the defendant, at the hearing, to controvert any of the allegations in the supplemental bill which are not admitted by his answer to the same. Complainants to have the same time to file a replication as they had at the time of giving notice of this application.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2 Sarat. Ch. Sent. 61, 1842 N.Y. LEXIS 511, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/day-v-potter-nychanct-1842.