DAWSON v. CARTER

District Court, S.D. Indiana·Decided December 17, 2020·No. 2:19-cv-00222·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA TERRE HAUTE DIVISION

CHARLES DAWSON, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) No. 2:19-cv-00222-JPH-MJD ) ROBERT E. CARTER, ) CHARLES DUGAN, ) DICK BROWN, ) JERRY SNYDER, ) RANDALL PARCEL, ) JACK HENDRIX, ) ) Defendants. )

ENTRY GRANTING SUMMARY JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANTS CARTER AND HENDRIX

Defendants Carter and Hendrix have filed an unopposed motion for summary judgment, dkt. [49], designating evidence that they had no personal involvement with the decision to place Mr. Dawson in administrative segregation or his 30-day reviews, see dkt. 49-1; dkt. 49-3; dkt. 50. “Individual liability under § 1983… requires personal involvement in the alleged constitutional deprivation.” Colbert v. City of Chicago, 851 F.3d 649, 657 (7th Cir. 2017) (internal quotation omitted) (citing Wolf-Lillie v. Sonquist, 699 F.2d 864, 869 (7th Cir. 1983) (“Section 1983 creates a cause of action based on personal liability and predicated upon fault. An individual cannot be held liable in a § 1983 action unless he caused or participated in an alleged constitutional deprivation.... A causal connection, or an affirmative link, between the misconduct complained of and the official sued is necessary.”)). Neither of these defendants were personally involved in the events challenged by the plaintiff in this case. The designated evidence demonstrates that 1) defendant Carter was not personally involved with any of the classification decisions challenged in this case, and 2) neither of these defendants were made aware of the plaintiff's conditions of confinement. See dkt. 49-1, dkt. 49-3. Because they cannot be held liable as individuals under § 1983 without personal involvement, see Colbert, 851 F.3d at 657, their motion for summary judgment, dkt. [49], is GRANTED. No partial final judgment shall issue at this time as to the claims brought against defendants Carter and Hendrix. The plaintiff's motion for summary judgment, dkt. 39, remains pending. SO ORDERED. Date: 12/17/2020

James Patrick Hanlon United States District Judge Southern District of Indiana

Distribution:

CHARLES DAWSON 162406 NEW CASTLE - CF NEW CASTLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY - Inmate Mail/Parcels 1000 Van Nuys Road NEW CASTLE, IN 47362

David C. Dickmeyer INDIANA ATTORNEY GENERAL David.Dickmeyer@atg.in.gov

Brandon Alan Skates INDIANA ATTORNEY GENERAL brandon.skates@atg.in.gov

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DAWSON v. CARTER, (S.D. Ind. 2020).

DAWSON v. CARTER (DAWSON v. CARTER) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Colbert v. City of Chicago
851 F.3d 649 (Seventh Circuit, 2017)