Dawson v. Allstate Insurance
This text of 417 S.E.2d 841 (Dawson v. Allstate Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
There is a cross assignment of error which is dispositive of this case. Defendant correctly argues that the trial court erred in denying its motion to dismiss plaintiff’s refiled complaint. Plaintiff’s initial complaint was dismissed for failure to state a claim. See N.C.R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6). “Unless the court in its order for dismissal otherwise specifies,” a dismissal for failure to state a claim “operates as an adjudication upon the merits.” N.C.R. Civ. P. 41(b). Therefore, we hold defendant’s motion to dismiss plaintiff’s refiled complaint should have been allowed.
For the reasons stated, judgment is vacated and the matter is remanded for entry of order dismissing the refiled complaint.
Vacated and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
417 S.E.2d 841, 106 N.C. App. 691, 1992 N.C. App. LEXIS 544, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dawson-v-allstate-insurance-ncctapp-1992.