Dawson v. Allstate Insurance

417 S.E.2d 841, 106 N.C. App. 691, 1992 N.C. App. LEXIS 544
Court of Appeals of North Carolina·Decided July 7, 1992·No. 9110SC433·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinions

ARNOLD, Judge.

There is a cross assignment of error which is dispositive of this case. Defendant correctly argues that the trial court erred in denying its motion to dismiss plaintiff’s refiled complaint. Plaintiff’s initial complaint was dismissed for failure to state a claim. See N.C.R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6). “Unless the court in its order for dismissal otherwise specifies,” a dismissal for failure to state a claim “operates as an adjudication upon the merits.” N.C.R. Civ. P. 41(b). Therefore, we hold defendant’s motion to dismiss plaintiff’s refiled complaint should have been allowed.

For the reasons stated, judgment is vacated and the matter is remanded for entry of order dismissing the refiled complaint.

Vacated and remanded.

Judge LEWIS concurs. Judge WYNN concurs with separate opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dawson v. Allstate Insurance, 417 S.E.2d 841, 106 N.C. App. 691, 1992 N.C. App. LEXIS 544 (N.C. Ct. App. 1992).

417 S.E.2d 841 (Dawson v. Allstate Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lawson v. Toney
169 F. Supp. 2d 456 (M.D. North Carolina, 2001)
Davis Lake Community Ass'n v. Feldmann
530 S.E.2d 870 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2000)
Schnitzlein v. Hardee's Food Systems, Inc.
516 S.E.2d 891 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1999)
Pieper v. Pieper
425 S.E.2d 435 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1993)
Dawson v. Allstate Insurance
417 S.E.2d 841 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1992)