Dawson Jr. v. Santander Consumer USA, Inc.

District Court, S.D. California·Decided July 27, 2022·No. 3:22-cv-00849·Unknown

Opinion

LUTHER C. DAWSON, JR., Case No.: 22cv849-JLS (MSB)

Plaintiff, ORDER: v. (1) GRANTING EX PARTE APPLICATION TO CHANGE EARLY NEUTRAL SANTANDER CONSUMER USA, INC., et al., EVALUATION DATE [ECF NO. 8]; AND Defendants. (2) SUA SPONTE CONVERTING THE EARLY NEUTRAL EVALUATION CONFERENCE AND CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE TO VIDEO CONFERENCES On July 25, 2022, Defendant Santander Consumer USA, Inc. (“Santander”) filed an “Ex Parte Application to Change Early Neutral Evaluation Date Due to Party and Counsel Unavailability.” (ECF No. 8.) In the motion, Santander explains that it has two conflicts with the August 17, 2022 Early Neutral Evaluation (“ENE”) date previously set by this court: its party representative is scheduled to attend a mediation in another case and its counsel will be away on a preplanned international vacation. (Id. at 2; ECF No. 8-1 at 2-3.) Counsel for Plaintiff and Defendant Experian indicated to Santander’s counsel that their clients do not oppose continuing the ENE and Case Management Conference (“CMC”), provided the new date works with the schedules of the parties and their counsel informed the Court via email, copied to counsel for all parties, that all necessary participants as required by the Court’s Notice and Order for Early Neutral Evaluation Conference and Case Management Conference [ECF No. 7] are available on August 31, 2022, at 9:30 a.m. Based on the foregoing, the Court finds good cause to GRANT the ex parte application and CONTINUE the ENE/CMC. Additionally, the Court sua sponte CONVERTS the ENE/CMC to video conferences. The Court ORDERS as follows: The ENE and CMC previously scheduled for August 17, 2022, are CONTINUED to August 31, 2022, at 9:30 a.m., and will be held via video conference through the Court’s ZoomGov account. All discussions at the ENE Conference will be informal, off the record, privileged, and confidential. Counsel for any non-English speaking party is responsible for arranging for the appearance of an interpreter at the conference. The following rules and deadlines apply: 1. Personal Appearance of Parties Required: All named parties, party representatives, including claims adjusters for insured defendants, as well as the principal attorney(s) responsible for the litigation, must participate in the video conference, and be legally and factually prepared to discuss and resolve the case. Counsel appearing without their clients (whether or not counsel has been given settlement authority) will be cause for immediate imposition of sanctions and may also result in the immediate termination of the conference. 2. Full Settlement Authority Required: A party or party representative with full settlement authority1 must be present at the conference. Retained outside

1 “Full settlement authority” means that the individuals at the settlement conference must be authorized to fully explore settlement options and to agree at that time to any settlement terms acceptable to the parties. Heileman Brewing Co. v. Joseph Oat Corp., 871 F.2d 648, 653 (7th Cir. 1989). representative who has the authority to negotiate and enter into a settlement. 3. Confidential ENE Statements Required: No later than August 24, 2022, the parties shall submit directly to Magistrate Judge Berg’s chambers (via hand delivery or by e-mail to the Court at efile_berg@casd.uscourts.gov), confidential settlement statements. The ENE statement is limited to five (5) pages or less, and up to five (5) pages of exhibits or declarations. Each party’s ENE statement must outline (1) the nature of the case and the claims, (2) position on liability or defense, (3) position regarding settlement of the case with a specific demand/offer for settlement, and (4) any previous settlement negotiations or mediation efforts. If a specific demand or offer cannot be made at the time the ENE statement is submitted, then the reasons as to why a demand or offer cannot be made must be stated. Further, the party must explain when they will be in a position to state a demand or offer. General statements such as a party will “negotiate in good faith” is not a specific demand or offer. The ENE statement should be submitted confidentially and need not be shared with other parties. 4. The Court will use its official Zoom video conferencing account to hold the ENE. IF YOU ARE UNFAMILIAR WITH ZOOM: Zoom is available on computers through a download on the Zoom website (https://zoom.us/meetings) or on mobile devices through the installation of a free app.2 Joining a Zoom conference does not require creating a Zoom account, but it does require downloading the .exe file (if using a party. Pitman v. Brinker Int’l, Inc., 216 F.R.D. 481, 485–86 (D. Ariz. 2003). The purpose of requiring a person with unlimited settlement authority to attend the conference contemplates that the person’s view of the case may be altered during the face to face conference. Id. at 486. A limited or a sum certain of authority is not adequate. See Nick v. Morgan’s Foods, Inc., 270 F.3d 590, 595–97 (8th Cir. 2001). 2 If possible, participants are encouraged to use laptops or desktop computers for the video conference, an account, install Zoom, and familiarize themselves with Zoom in advance of the ENE.3 There is a cost-free option for creating a Zoom account. 5. Prior to the start of the ENE, the Court will e-mail each ENE participant an invitation to join a Zoom video conference. Again, if possible, participants are encouraged to use laptops or desktop computers for the video conference, as mobile devices often offer inferior performance. Participants shall join the video conference by following the ZoomGov Meeting hyperlink in the invitation. Participants who do not have Zoom already installed on their device when they click on the ZoomGov Meeting hyperlink will be prompted to download and install Zoom before proceeding. Zoom may then prompt participants to enter the password included in the invitation. All participants will be placed in a waiting room until the ENE begins. 6. Each participant should plan to join the Zoom video conference at least five minutes before the start of the ENE to ensure that the ENE begins promptly at 9:30 a.m. The Zoom e-mail invitation may indicate an earlier start time, but the ENE will begin at the Court-scheduled time. 7. Zoom’s functionalities will allow the Court to conduct the ENE as it ordinarily would conduct an in-person ENE. That is, the Court will begin the ENE with all participants joined together in a main session. After an initial discussion in the main session, the Court will divide participants into separate, confidential sessions, which Zoom calls Breakout Rooms.4 In a Breakout Room, the Court will be able to communicate with participants from a single party in confidence. Breakout Rooms will also allow parties and counsel to communicate confidentially without the Court. / / / 3 For help getting started with Zoom, visit: https://support.zoom.us/hc/en-us/categories/200101697- Getting-Started. to the Court at efile_berg@casd.uscourts.gov containing the following: a. The name and title of each participant, including all parties and party representatives with full settlement authority, claims adjusters for insured defendants, and the primary attorney(s) responsible for the litigation; b. An e-mail address for each participant to receive the Zoom video conference invitation; and c. A telephone number where each participant may be reached so that if technical difficulties arise, the Court will be able to proceed telephonically instead of by video conference. (If counsel prefers all participants of their party on a single conference call, counsel may provide a conference number and appropriate call-in information, including an access code, where

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dawson Jr. v. Santander Consumer USA, Inc., (S.D. Cal. 2022).

Dawson Jr. v. Santander Consumer USA, Inc. (Dawson Jr. v. Santander Consumer USA, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related