Davoli v. New York State Electric & Gas Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Davoli v. New York State Electric & Gas Corp.

248 A.D.2d 989, 670 N.Y.S.2d 131, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3053

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 13, 1998

DocketAppeal No. 1

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 248 A.D.2d 989 (Davoli v. New York State Electric & Gas Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Davoli v. New York State Electric & Gas Corp., 248 A.D.2d 989, 670 N.Y.S.2d 131, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3053 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

—Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs in accordance with the following Memorandum: Supreme Court erred in awarding plaintiff attorney’s fees and costs on her motion to compel discovery (see, CPLR 3126). There is no evidence in the record that defendant or its attorney willfully refused to comply with plaintiff’s discovery demand, made just over two months before plaintiffs motion to compel, and the record discloses that defendant’s attorney requested clarification in attempting to comply with the demand (cf., Summit Waterproofing & Restoration Corp. v Scarsdale Country Estates Owners, 228 AD2d 431; Preferred Equities Corp. v Ziegleman, 190 AD2d 659). We note in addition that plaintiff had delayed nine months in responding to defendant’s discovery demands and only responded then after defendant made a motion to preclude. At a minimum, the court should have issued a conditional order before imposing the sanction of attorney’s fees in this case. We therefore modify the order in appeal No. 1 by vacating the award of attorney’s fees and costs. In light of our determination, the order in appeal No. 2 determining the amount of attorney’s fees and costs must be vacated. (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Ontario County, Harvey, J. — Counsel Fees.)

Present — Lawton, J. P., Hayes, Wisner, Boehm and Fallon, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs in accordance with the following Memorandum: Supreme Court erred in awarding plaintiff attorney’s fees and costs on her motion to compel discovery (see, CPLR 3126). There is no evidence in the record that defendant or its attorney willfully refused to comply with plaintiff’s discovery demand, made just over two months before plaintiffs motion to compel, and the record discloses that defendant’s attorney requested clarification in attempting to comply with the demand (cf., Summit Waterproofing & Restoration Corp. v Scarsdale Country Estates Owners, 228 AD2d 431; Preferred Equities Corp. v Ziegleman, 190 AD2d 659). We note in addition that plaintiff had delayed nine months in responding to defendant’s discovery demands and only responded then after defendant made a motion to preclude. At a minimum, the court should have issued a conditional order before imposing the sanction of attorney’s fees in this case. We therefore modify the order in appeal No. 1 by vacating the award of attorney’s fees and costs. In light of our determination, the order in appeal No. 2 determining the amount of attorney’s fees and costs must be vacated. (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Ontario County, Harvey, J. — Counsel Fees.)

Present — Lawton, J. P., Hayes, Wisner, Boehm and Fallon, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

248 A.D.2d 989, 670 N.Y.S.2d 131, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3053, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/davoli-v-new-york-state-electric-gas-corp-nyappdiv-1998.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack