Davis v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

743 N.E.2d 401, 91 Ohio St. 3d 1461, 2001 Ohio LEXIS 738
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Davis v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.. Read the opinion of the Court — 93 Ohio St. 3d 488
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided March 7, 2001·No. 00-1145·Published

Opinion

Cuyahoga App. No. 75224. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga County. Upon consideration of appellants’ motion to reschedule oral argument currently scheduled for March 28, 2001,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion to reschedule oral argument be, and hereby is, denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Davis v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 743 N.E.2d 401, 91 Ohio St. 3d 1461, 2001 Ohio LEXIS 738 (Ohio 2001).

743 N.E.2d 401 (Davis v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.