Davis v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

736 N.E.2d 26, 90 Ohio St. 3d 1429, 2000 Ohio LEXIS 2512
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 4, 2000
Docket00-1145
StatusPublished

This text of 736 N.E.2d 26 (Davis v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Davis v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 736 N.E.2d 26, 90 Ohio St. 3d 1429, 2000 Ohio LEXIS 2512 (Ohio 2000).

Opinion

Cuyahoga App. No. 75224. Discretionary appeal allowed and motion for admission pro hac vice of Melanie P. Sarwal by Brian G. Selden granted.

Resnick and Pfeifer, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
736 N.E.2d 26, 90 Ohio St. 3d 1429, 2000 Ohio LEXIS 2512, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/davis-v-wal-mart-stores-inc-ohio-2000.