Davis v. State

293 S.W. 1117, 106 Tex. Crim. 503, 1927 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 213
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Davis v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 100 Tex. Crim. 617
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided April 13, 1927·No. No. 10535.·Published

Opinion

BETHEA, Judge.

The appellant was tried and convicted of the offense of burglary, and his -punishment assessed at four years in the penitentiary.

This case is a companion one with the case of M. M. Barrington v. State, 291 S. W. 557. The appellant and his co-defendant Barrington were separately indicted, but by agreement were tried jointly. The records in both cases are exactly the same. The questions relied upon for a reversal in the instant case were disposed of adversely to appellant’s contention in the opinion in the Barrington case referred to above.

The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

*504 The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Davis v. State, 293 S.W. 1117, 106 Tex. Crim. 503, 1927 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 213 (Tex. 1927).

293 S.W. 1117 (Davis v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Barrington v. State
291 S.W. 557 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1927)