Davis v. State

276 S.W. 698, 101 Tex. Crim. 667, 1925 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 972
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Davis v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 93 Tex. Crim. 192
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided May 6, 1925·No. No. 9033.·Published

Opinions

The offense is the unlawful possession of intoxicating liquors for the purpose of sale.

The motion of the State to dismiss the appeal for want of a recognizance describing the offense, as required by Art. 903, C. C. P., must be sustained.

By Art. 923, C. C. P., authority is given this court to extend to the accused the privilege of entering into a new bond or recognizance. If this should be done and a certified copy of the new bond or recognizance, in compliance with the law, be filed in this court within fifteen days from the date of this order, the appeal will be reinstated.

The appeal is dismissed.

Dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Davis v. State, 276 S.W. 698, 101 Tex. Crim. 667, 1925 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 972 (Tex. 1925).

276 S.W. 698 (Davis v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Galpin v. Page
85 U.S. 350 (Supreme Court, 1874)
American Central Insurance v. Heath & Blackwell
69 S.W. 235 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1902)
Largen v. State, ex rel. Abrey
13 S.W. 161 (Texas Supreme Court, 1890)