Davis v. State

1943 OK CR 44, 135 P.2d 997, 76 Okla. Crim. 245, 1943 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 93
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Davis v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 71 Okla. Crim. 82
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma·Decided April 7, 1943·No. No. A-9805.·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The right of appeal is granted by law, and is a right that all persons convicted of crime in the courts of the state may- exercise. In other words, it is a privilege granted by the law to those against whom judgments of confinement or punishment by fine was rendered, which they may exercise at their opinion. When an appeal is once lodged in this court, and the cause submitted, unless good cause is shown to- the contrary, this court has uniformly permitted the plaintiff in error to dismiss his appeal at his election. Nash v. State, 13 Okla. Cr. 211, 163 P. 330.

In the instant case there is no reason made to appear why the dismissal should not be ordered in compliance with the stipulation of the respective counsel.

It is therefore adjudged and ordered that the appeal be and is accordingly dismissed. Mandate forthwith.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Davis v. State, 1943 OK CR 44, 135 P.2d 997, 76 Okla. Crim. 245, 1943 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 93 (Okla. Ct. App. 1943).

1943 OK CR 44 (Davis v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Nash v. State
1917 OK CR 53 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1917)