Davis v. State

1943 OK CR 44, 135 P.2d 997, 76 Okla. Crim. 245, 1943 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 93
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
DecidedApril 7, 1943
DocketNo. A-9805.
StatusPublished

This text of 1943 OK CR 44 (Davis v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Davis v. State, 1943 OK CR 44, 135 P.2d 997, 76 Okla. Crim. 245, 1943 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 93 (Okla. Ct. App. 1943).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The right of appeal is granted by law, and is a right that all persons convicted of crime in the courts of the state may- exercise. In other words, it is a privilege granted by the law to those against whom judgments of confinement or punishment by fine was rendered, which they may exercise at their opinion. When an appeal is once lodged in this court, and the cause submitted, unless good cause is shown to- the contrary, this court has uniformly permitted the plaintiff in error to dismiss his appeal at his election. Nash v. State, 13 Okla. Cr. 211, 163 P. 330.

In the instant case there is no reason made to appear why the dismissal should not be ordered in compliance with the stipulation of the respective counsel.

It is therefore adjudged and ordered that the appeal be and is accordingly dismissed. Mandate forthwith.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Nash v. State
1917 OK CR 53 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1917)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1943 OK CR 44, 135 P.2d 997, 76 Okla. Crim. 245, 1943 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 93, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/davis-v-state-oklacrimapp-1943.