Davis v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Davis v. State

568 S.W.3d 557

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided February 26, 2019·No. No. ED 106605·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Derreaun Davis appeals the motion court's judgment denying his motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to Rule 24.035 without an evidentiary hearing. We find that the motion court's findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Derreaun Davis appeals the motion court's judgment denying his motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to Rule 24.035 without an evidentiary hearing. We find that the motion court's findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Davis v. State, 568 S.W.3d 557 (Mo. Ct. App. 2019).

Pincite

568 S.W.3d 557 (Davis v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.