Davis v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Davis v. State

484 S.W.3d 840, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 259, 2016 WL 1103972

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedMarch 22, 2016

DocketNo. ED 102998

StatusPublished

This text of 484 S.W.3d 840 (Davis v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Davis v. State, 484 S.W.3d 840, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 259, 2016 WL 1103972 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Willie J. Davis (“Movant”) appeals from the motion court’s denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. .After a jury trial, Movant was convicted of attempted forcible sodomy in violation of Section 566.060, RSMo (Cum. Supp. 2009). Movant was sentenced to ten years in prison. This Court affirmed his conviction and sentence. State v. Davis, 422 S.W.3d 458 (Mo.App.E.D. 2014). We affirm the motion court’s denial of post-conviction relief.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record ,on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Ruíe 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI