Davis v. State
226 S.W.3d 898, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 967, 2007 WL 1814397
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Davis v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 623 →
Opinion
ORDER
Jemal Davis appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We find that the motion court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting for the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment under Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Davis v. State, 226 S.W.3d 898, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 967, 2007 WL 1814397 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).
226 S.W.3d 898 (Davis v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.