Davis v. State
190 S.W.3d 388, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 1366, 2005 WL 2276510
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Davis v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 623 →
Opinion
ORDER
Corey DeWayne Davis appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that the judgment is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous and that no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value but a memorandum explaining our reasoning has been provided to the parties.
Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Davis v. State, 190 S.W.3d 388, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 1366, 2005 WL 2276510 (Mo. Ct. App. 2005).
190 S.W.3d 388 (Davis v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.