Davis v. State

936 S.W.2d 175, 1996 Mo. App. LEXIS 1994, 1996 WL 705819

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Darryl Davis appeals from the trial court’s denial of his Rule 24.035 motion. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find both claims of error to be without merit. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).