Davis v. State

45 So. 3d 540, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 15440, 2010 WL 3927307
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Davis v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 973 So. 2d 1277
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 8, 2010·No. No. 5D10-2261·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The petition for belated appeal is denied. The appointed commissioner found that the credible evidence rebutted petitioner’s form allegations, relying on the written plea agreement, the plea and sentencing transcript, the testimony of trial counsel, and post-trial letters from petitioner to trial counsel.

[541]*541Petitioners are cautioned about attempting to mislead this court. See, e.g., Svoboda v. State, 932 So.2d 545, 546-47 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006) (petitioner who lied under oath at commissioner’s hearing had request for belated appeal denied and certified copy of the opinion was forwarded to correctional institution for consideration of disciplinary procedures pursuant to § 944.279(1), Fla. Stat. (2004)); Adair v. State, 20 So.3d 977, 978-79 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009) (adopting Svo-boda). Petitioners who utilize form petitions should carefully ensure that the form accurately states the facts of their particular case.

PETITION DENIED.

MONACO, C.J., EVANDER and COHEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Davis v. State, 45 So. 3d 540, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 15440, 2010 WL 3927307 (Fla. Ct. App. 2010).

45 So. 3d 540 (Davis v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Adair v. State
20 So. 3d 977 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2009)
Svoboda v. State
932 So. 2d 545 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)