Davis v. State

969 So. 2d 1077, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 16141, 2007 WL 2962588
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 12, 2007·No. No. 5D06-2892·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Teffeteller v. Dugger, 734 So.2d 1009, 1023 (Fla.1999) (“Trial counsel cannot be deemed ineffective for failing to raise meritless claims or claims that had no reasonable probability of affecting the outcome of the proceeding.”).

PALMER, C.J., THOMPSON and MONACO, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Davis v. State, 969 So. 2d 1077, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 16141, 2007 WL 2962588 (Fla. Ct. App. 2007).

969 So. 2d 1077 (Davis v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

bsp/port Orange v. Water Mill Properties
969 So. 2d 1077 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007)